Posted to AROUND ABOUT TOWN by Brian Hughes
Nearly 30 people came out to Warriors Hall Tuesday evening to hear Police Chief Stephen McCosker’s vision for a Community Unity Walk that would unify the city’s various constituencies and compliment the chief’s initiative to unite police officers and the public.
During his interviews for the police chief’s job, “a focal point was community engagement,” Chief McCosker said. “It is something I’m very passionate about.”
Looking to hold an event in which as many residents as possible can participate, he hit on an idea modeled after the National Night Out, an August event that encourages people to go outside and meet their neighbors.
“Let’s organize a walk,” Chief McCosker said. “Not a 5K. Not a run. Just a walk. It’s something we all can do.”
The meeting drew 29 people representing a broad spectrum of the community, including city officials, clergy, law enforcement officers, community activists, Boy Scout leaders, Crestview High School leadership students, and representatives of various community, civic and cultural organizations.
“I want to thank you for even coming up with this idea,” the Rev. Clayton Williams said.
After input from the audience, Feb. 29 was selected as the date for the walk, which includes walkers carrying flashlights, which, Chief McCosker previously said, “is symbolic of our community uniting to place a light on crime and the perception of crime.”
“It is a leap year and catchy way to kick off the inaugural walk,” Chief McCosker said. “Sunset will be around 5:45 p.m. on that day so the walk will take place shortly afterwards.”
The route would center around the downtown and City Hall area, the chief said, noting, “It would be important to focus on that area’s revitalization.”
Main Street Crestview Association Director Sandra Wilson said her organization of downtown businesses is “willing to do whatever we can to help out.”
Crestview High School senior Hayleigh McMillian, a member of the school’s Leadership Club, suggested involving local businesses, saying they “could support the walk as vendors. They could offer things like hot chocolate and cookies or whatever.”
That there’s no budget for the walk doesn’t discourage Chief McCosker.
“I’m very good about making rock soup,” he said, referencing the European folk tale in which many villagers contribute to a community meal. That metaphor resounded with Dr. Karen Brown, head of the Crestview Youth Coalition.
“You have a lot of organizations leaders here,” she said. “If you could get a commitment from them to say, ‘Hey, I’m going to have my people there,’ we’d have a great turnout.”
Chief McCosker welcomed the discussion and suggestions and said a further planning meeting to iron out details will be held after Thanksgiving but before Christmas.
“I want to get everybody together as a group,” he said. “Once you get people together as one group, face-to-face, you’re breaking down barriers and uniting the community.”
INTERESTED IN JOINING?
Posted to City Clerk by Elizabeth Roy
The Facts about Sunshine Law Violation
Recently, The Crestview News Bulletin published an article about possible “Sunshine Law Violation” regarding a Workshop on October 15th about Itinerant Vendors. Here are the Facts:
The Sunshine law requires “reasonable notice” regarding any public meetings or workshops to be held by a local governmental entity.
From the Sunshine Law Manual:
The sunshine law does not define the term “reasonable notice.” Therefore, the type of notice is variable and depends upon the facts of the situation and the board involved. in each case, an agency must give notice at such time and in such a manner as to enable the media and the public to attend the meeting
The subject of the October 15 Workshop was discussed as an agenda item at the September 24 City council workshop. At that time, the date/Time of October 15 at 5:00 pm was discussed and agreed upon by the members of the City Council present.
The Agenda for the Meeting was posted online and in City Hall on Thursday, October 11. As a reminder, City hall was closed for Hurricane Michael at noon on October 9 and remained closed on October 10. Those citizens who have opted for text notifications should have received this text on October 11.
The Sunshine law also does not require that an agenda be published, although it is recommended, and we strive to get that information out as quickly as it is available.
From the Sunshine Manual:
The sunshine law does not mandate that an agency provide notice of each item to be discussed via a published agenda although the attorney general’s office has recommended the publication of an agenda, if available. The courts have rejected such a requirement because it could effectively preclude access to meetings by members of the public who wish to bring specific issues before a governmental body
In the recent article, there was a “quote” regarding the publication of agendas and supporting documents 7 days in advance. This comes from the Florida Administrative Procedure Act, and does not apply to Municipalities, or agencies appointed by a municipality.
Florida Statute 120, which establishes the Administrative Procedure Act. In section
120.52 establishes the definition of an agency.
“120.52 Definitions. —As used in this act:
(1) “Agency” means the following officers or governmental entities if acting pursuant to powers other than those derived from the constitution:
(a) The Governor; each state officer and state department, and each departmental unit described in s. 20.04; the Board of Governors of the State University System; the Commission on Ethics; the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; a regional water supply authority; a regional planning agency; a multicounty special district, but only if a majority of its governing board is comprised of nonelected persons; educational units; and each entity described in chapters 163, 373, 380, and 582 and s. 186.504.
(b) Each officer and governmental entity in the state having statewide jurisdiction or jurisdiction in more than one county.
(c) Each officer and governmental entity in the state having jurisdiction in one county or less than one county, to the extent they are expressly made subject to this chapter by general or special law or existing judicial decisions.
This definition does not include a municipality or legal entity created solely by a municipality; a legal entity or agency created in whole or in part pursuant to part II of chapter 361; a metropolitan planning organization created pursuant to s. 339.175; a separate legal or administrative entity created pursuant to s. 339.175 of which a metropolitan planning organization is a member; an expressway authority pursuant to chapter 348 or any transportation authority or commission under chapter 343 or chapter 349; or a legal or administrative entity created by an interlocal agreement pursuant to s. 163.01(7), unless any party to such agreement is otherwise an agency as defined in this subsection.”
The term agency applies to the definition above. The exact excerpt from the Administrative Procedure Act is as follows:
“120.525 Meetings, hearings, and workshops. —
(1) Except in the case of emergency meetings, each agency shall give notice of public meetings, hearings, and workshops by publication in the Florida Administrative Register and on the agency’s website not less than 7 days before the event. The notice shall include a statement of the general subject matter to be considered.”
The workshop that was held on October 15 was solely intended for the City Council to hear the facts and to determine what if any changes needed to be made to the “proposed ordinance” and if in fact they wanted to proceed with an ordinance. The agenda clearly stated that the subject of itinerant vendors would be the topic, and the documentation itself was over 110 pages long. If and when the ordinance is complete, it will be presented in the prescribed fashion in a regular or special meeting and the final reading and public hearing will be advertised a minimum of 10 days prior, as required by Statute.
The only sunshine requirement for the documentation was that it be available as a public record request. That request was made at the end of the meeting, and while an immediate providing of those documents is not required, they were handed to the requesting party before they left the meeting room. No other requests for the documents have been received.
If you have any questions. Feel free to contact my office at 850-682-1560 or email@example.com
Posted to Council Member, Group 1 by Thomas Sutton